You are in control of your cookies

    Atlas uses strictly necessary cookies to keep you signed in. With your consent, we add anonymized product analytics, conversion attribution, and remembered preferences. Change your mind any time at /privacy/cookies.

    Off until you agree · Change it any time

    • NecessaryAlways on
    • AnalyticsOpt-in
    • MarketingOpt-in
    • PreferencesOpt-in
    Still loading. Try again in a moment.Still loading. Try again in a moment.Still loading. Try again in a moment.
    Atlas
    • All-in-one
    • Solutions
    • Compare
    • Pricing
    PricingGet started
    1. Atlas
    2. Guides
    3. Service Desk SLA: Setting Response and Resolution Targets
    October 26, 2026·8 min read·service desk, SLA, ITSM, service operations

    Service Desk SLA: Setting Response and Resolution Targets

    A service level agreement is a promise. Make it one you can keep, measure it honestly, and report misses without defensiveness.

    A service level agreement, or SLA, states the level of service a provider commits to deliver, usually including how quickly it will respond to and resolve requests. For an internal service desk, the SLA is an agreement with the rest of the organisation. For an external provider, it is part of a contract, and a miss may carry a penalty.

    Three related terms

    • SLA: the commitment made to the customer or user, often with consequences.
    • SLO: a service level objective, an internal target set to meet the SLA with margin, or a target without a contractual promise.
    • OLA: an operational level agreement between internal teams, such as the time the network team will take to respond to a request from the desk.

    Response is not resolution

    Define two clocks. Response time is how long until a person acknowledges and begins work. Resolution time is how long until the request is fixed. Promising resolution times for work whose duration is unpredictable is a trap, so for many request types the honest commitment is a response time and a target for resolution that is reviewed, not guaranteed.

    Say when each clock starts and stops, and what pauses it. A request waiting for information from the user is waiting on them, not on you. State the hours the clock runs, such as business hours in a named time zone.

    Set tiers by priority

    Tie targets to the priority from the triage matrix. The values below are an illustration of structure, not a recommendation, and each organisation should set its own from its capacity and needs.

    • Critical: immediate response, continuous work, frequent updates.
    • High: response within the hour during service hours, resolution targeted within the working day.
    • Medium: response within a few working hours, resolution within a few working days.
    • Low: response within a working day, resolution scheduled.

    Base the numbers on evidence

    Measure first. Look at how long requests actually take, by type, and set targets you can meet most of the time, tightening as the process improves. A target that is missed constantly is ignored, and one that is never missed may be too loose.

    Express targets in Atlas

    Atlas does not have a request SLA timer that pauses, resumes and records breaches automatically. For requests handled as tasks, express a target through priority and due date, and review the overdue list as a routine. For incidents, severity levels carry response targets and the platform records time to acknowledge, mitigate and resolve from real instants, counting only the first acknowledgement. If you need contractual SLA timing with pauses and breach reports, use a dedicated ITSM suite.

    Report honestly

    • Report the percentage of requests that met the target, by priority, with the number of requests behind each percentage.
    • Show the worst cases, not only the average.
    • Explain misses with causes, and track the fix.
    • Do not change the definition of the clock to improve the number.

    Keep reading

    • Service desk guide
    • Ticket triage and priority
    • Incident severity levels
    • ITSM explained
    • ITSM for Small Teams: A Lightweight Way to Start
    • ITSM Tool Requirements: A Buyer Checklist
    • Problem Management: From Repeat Incidents to Known Errors
    • Service Request vs Incident: How to Tell Them Apart
    • Free PDF tools
    • The all-in-one work OS

    FAQ

    Questions, answered.

    What is the difference between response time and resolution time?
    Response time is how long until someone acknowledges the request and starts work. Resolution time is how long until it is fixed. They are separate commitments, and response is far easier to promise.
    What is the difference between an SLA and an SLO?
    An SLA is a commitment made to a customer, often with consequences. An SLO is an internal objective, often stricter, used to meet the SLA with margin.

    Ready when you are

    One workspace, not ten.

    Atlas replaces the stack with one platform for tasks, projects, CRM, contracts, e-signature, PDF tools, and analytics. Start free.

    Get started freeSee pricing
    AtlasWork, planned itself.

    The AI-native, all-in-one work platform. Tasks, projects, CRM, contracts, and analytics in one calm workspace.

    System status
    • SSO
    • SCIM
    • Two-factor sign-in
    • Audit log

    Product

    • Overview
    • PDF tools
    • Diagram tools
    • People & HR
    • Integrations
    • Marketplace
    • Pricing

    Resources

    • Guides
    • Glossary
    • Compare
    • Docs
    • API reference
    • Support
    • Changelog
    • Status

    Company

    • About
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Contact

    Legal & trust

    • Trust center
    • Security
    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • DPA
    • GDPR
    • SLA
    • Refunds
    • Google API data
    Atlas, a product by wrxstack.com·© 2026 wrxstack·All rights reserved
    PrivacyTermsSecurityStatus